| In this chapter we will look more closely at the different psychological mechanisms that can lead us into believing various theories about the world that can’t be verified as factually correct. It is well known that there are a lot of well described and well understood psychological mechanisms in play when we consume information and try to understand the world based on them. Researchers believe that some of the psychological mechanisms are in fact connected to the evolutionary process and that they are perfectly natural and reasonable responses, even though the result is that we end up believing in things that aren’t actually real. Others are of our interaction with others in a modern society, and the need to quickly understand the situation we are in, the context, the people we are dealing with, and what their agenda might be. For more detailed information about the topic please read Chapter 3 from the Critical Balance e-book. Below you will find a list of training activities you can implement with your class/young people with the purpose of gaining knowledge and abilities dealing with various aspects related to conspiracy theories. |
![]() |

What is a conspiracy theory?

The information bubble

Why do we believe in conspiracy theories?

Fact checking

What is critical thinking?

How to escape the rabbit hole?
Learning Outcomes
- Comprehend the concept of cognitive dissonance and recognize its role in accepting new ideas or conflicting information
- Develop critical thinking skills by analysing arguments from both sides and evaluating evidence to support their positions
- Understand the value of being open-minded and willing to embrace new ideas as a means of personal growth and understanding
- Be able to explore strategies to overcome cognitive dissonance, fostering a willingness to consider diverse perspectives
- Be able to hold respectful communications and active listening, creating a safe space for diverse opinions.
- Able to reflect on their own beliefs and evaluate how cognitive dissonance may have influenced their willingness to accept new ideas in the past.

