Activity 3 - Explain to me why!

This activity is an example of combining spotlight and floodlight debunking techniques. 

Spotlight debunking is a technique that is intended for conspiracies based on a single fact. If you manage to disprove that fact, the whole building will crumble. Let’s say that the person you are speaking to believes that many foods, drugs, and even everyday items contain dangerous toxins and the only way to preserve one’s health is to buy natural products that are safe from them. In order to help this person, you need to help them discover whether ‘toxins’ really exist and whether they do what they think they do. Easier said than done, however. Such undertaking would require a basic understanding of chemistry, or instance. A more practical approach would be undermining the concept of “natural ingredients”, showing that they also contain chemical compounds, which, under certain circumstances, might also be dangerous. 

In many cases conspiracy theorists are immune to a ‘magic bullet’ – a single fact that will make them reconsider their beliefs. They might subscribe to several theories, each of which based on several facts. In that case, the only solution is to address all of them. Every single one. Because even if a single argument remains valid, they may retain their beliefs, which is much easier psychologically than changing them.

Is recommended that the trainer tries to find out some information on the conspiracy theories included in the activity on:
https://www.metabunk.org/home/

Description
In this activity, learners have to find their own resources in order to debunk one particular claim of a conspiracy theory.
Learning Outcomes
After completing this activity, learners will:
  • become familiar with a variety of information sources on different aspects of conspiracy theories
  • practice research skills
  • gain insights into critical thinking
  • be able to construct convincing arguments
  • be willing to confront misleading claims;

Materials needed for implementation
  • 1 set of printouts of conspiracy claims 
  • a computer or laptop for each participant (or a pair of participants if there are more than 8)
  • projector
  • whiteboard

Time required
105 min.
Minimum / Maximum group size
4 - 16 person
Level
Intermediary (independent research skills required)
Introduction
Since the activity makes use of different conspiracy-related claims liked to the Covid-19 pandemic, a good start would be to ask the participants about any strange or suspicious explanations they have heard themselves. It does not matter if they believe there might be some truth related to the claims, or if they sound completely unreasonable. After all claims are collected, the group might decide to include one or two of them to the other claims contained in the activity.
Activity description
1. Present participants with the handouts containing different claims related to the Covid-19 pandemic - including the extra ones shared during the introduction if relevant. One claim per participant (or per pair, if you decide that working in cooperation would be more effective).
5 min.



2. Learners get to research their own sources on the claim and explain to the group what they consider to be the truth on the matter. They can use any resources they wish. The result should be a short presentation aimed at their peers.
60 min.


3. Learners present their findings to the group using the projector and whiteboard. Other participants are encouraged to ask questions and to put the sources used in doubt.
30 min.
Debriefing
Learners can vote on which presentation they found more convincing, and why they think it was the most effective. They can share tips for discovering interesting resources and how to present them in an engaging fashion.
10 min.
Adaptation to online mode
Since all the research happens online and the presentations can easily be shared with other participants, this activity can be delivered in an online setting without modifications.
Further resources
You can find other conspiracy theories in the Critical Balance Conspiracy map and use any of them as a basis for a modification of the activity.
References
COVID: Top 10 current conspiracy theories by Marc Lunas. April 2020: https://allianceforscience.org/blog/2020/04/covid-top-10-current-conspiracy-theories/

Metabunk:
https://www.metabunk.org/home/

West Mick (2018). Escaping the rabbit hole: how to debunk conspiracy theories using facts, logic, and respect. Skyhorse Publishing, New York
cookieCookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.